![]() Our only real problems lie with insufficient support from closed source vendors (primarily things like Flash) due to low user bases, due largely to FUD and apathy. Linux itself is absolutely stable 64 bit. You don't NEED significantly more memory to run 64 bit, especially under a lean and mean distro like ours (typically around 200MB of ram is used on above mentioned laptop when running Gnome, Compiz-Fusion, Firefox and a couple PDFs), but it gives you the OPTION to address more memory. The main problem with 64 bit is that too many people take the lazy way out, so there aren't enough voices yelling loud enough for better upstream support. ![]() Even installing flash isn't an issue, thanks to the wiki pages. I've put Arch64 on a 1.8GHz Celeron M laptop with 512MB ram and have had absolutely zero problems. I personally think that the potential advantages outweigh the potential disadvantages. The conclusion: I should install 64-bit OS. Do I really need to care about it? Isn't it the JVM's and Python's developers' problem? (Or, perhaps, I'm missing the point here?)ġ) Since there is no noticable performance improvement of 64-bit OS over 32-bit one, using 32-bit OS is recommended (lower memory consumption).Ģ) Since my machine has 2 GB RAM, and it will be upgraded to 4 GB in 1-2 years, 64-bit OS is recommended. The first graph shows the relative performance of the CPU compared to the 10 other common (single) CPUs in terms of PassMark CPU Mark. This is made using thousands of PerformanceTest benchmark results and is updated daily. I use Java and Python, cross-platform languages. Price and performance details for the Intel Core2 Duo T5670 1.80GHz can be found below. But I'm not a "hardware guy", so I wanted to make myself sure.Īd.2) I'm a developer, but my target is desktop. Here are 3 situations I would not recommand a 64 bit system :ġ - You think your system will be faster than a 32 bit one.Ģ - You do not know what a 64 bit system is against a 32 bit system and its consequences on programming stuffsģ - You do not want to bother with recompiling stuffs or change some software you use because they do not support 64 bit.Īd.1) I don't think so I didn't think so. Here are 3 situations I would recommand a 64 bit system :ģ - You have a specific need which justify the 64 bit (special software, research, advanced use such as cluster. More ever a 64 bit system consumes more memory than a 32 bit one (the binaries are bigger). This mean that I am using an i686 build under the core2duo (圆4) whithout any problem.Īll the people I know using a 64 bit architecture did not notice a real performance improvement which could justify to change your 32 bit system to a 64 bit system. I have just changed my whole hardware (but the hard disks) from PIV to Intel Core2Duo, and I had almost nothing to do, thanks to Arch :-)
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |